Skip to content
HARBAN AI LABS

Meta

Muse Glimmer

Part of Meta’s Muse family. Registry facts are limited to what Meta states on its own pages, each linked to where we found it. Benchmark results carry their own source and provenance label.
CurrentVerified against official sources

Verified facts

“source” links to the official page each value was confirmed on

Organization
Meta
Family
Muse
Release date
(announced)source for Release date (external site)
Context window
131,072 tokensStated as “131,072+ (HF card); '128K tokens by default; longer contexts supported' (Meta dev docs)”source for Context window (external site)
Max output tokens
Not verified
Knowledge cutoff
January 4, 2026 (model card)source for Knowledge cutoff (external site)
API model ID
Not verified
Status
Current
Last verified

Reported benchmark results

4 results on file. Scores are copied exactly as published, with the settings the source stated. Rows are different measurements — compare a score only with others in the same benchmark variant, via the variant link.

Benchmark results reported for Muse Glimmer
BenchmarkVariantModel detailScoreSettings (as stated)SourceEvidence
AIME2026 — see all AIME results for this variantHigh Reasoning
94.7%No CI reported
High Reasoning
Show excerpt for Muse Glimmer (High Reasoning) on AIME, 2026
“| AIME 2026 | **94.7** | 89.2 | 94.1 |”

Retrieved

GPQA DiamondNo variant stated — see all GPQA Diamond results for this variantHigh Reasoning
83.5%No CI reported
Full 198-question set; high reasoning; temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 64. The model card marks the row “(AA)”; Meta’s linked methodology report states GPQA Diamond results are sourced from Artificial Analysis.
Show excerpt for Muse Glimmer (High Reasoning) on GPQA Diamond, No variant stated
“| GPQA Diamond (AA) | 83.5 | **85.7** | 84.2 |”

Retrieved

SWE-bench VerifiedNo variant stated — see all SWE-bench Verified results for this variantHigh Reasoning
76.0%No CI reported
High reasoning; scaffold with a bash tool and a file-operation tool; average pass rate over 500 tasks, averaged across 4 runs (Meta methodology report).
Show excerpt for Muse Glimmer (High Reasoning) on SWE-bench Verified, No variant stated
“| SWE-Bench Verified | 76.0 | 66.6 | **77.2** |”

Retrieved

Terminal-Bench2.1 — see all Terminal-Bench results for this variantHigh Reasoning
51.7%No CI reported
with terminus2; High Reasoning. Meta’s linked methodology report states Terminal-Bench 2.1 results are sourced from Artificial Analysis (Terminus 2 harness in an E2B sandbox; 89 tasks).
Show excerpt for Muse Glimmer (High Reasoning) on Terminal-Bench, 2.1
“| TerminalBench 2.1 (with terminus2) | 51.7 | 43.4 | **60.7** |”

Retrieved

Vendor-reported:
Published by the organisation that built the model. Not independently reproduced.
Third-party:
Measured and published by an independent evaluator.
Report an issue with this page

Spotted a wrong number, a broken source or something out of date in “Muse Glimmer”? Tell us what and, if you can, link the correct source.

Required. At least 10 characters.

Model registry/models
Benchmarks/benchmarks
Paper breakdowns/research
AI tools directory/tools
Work with us/work-with-us