Skip to content
HARBAN AI LABS

Google DeepMind

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Part of Google DeepMind’s Gemini 3 family. Registry facts are limited to what Google DeepMind states on its own pages, each linked to where we found it. Benchmark results carry their own source and provenance label.
PreviewVerified against official sources

Verified facts

“source” links to the official page each value was confirmed on

Organization
Google DeepMind
Family
Gemini 3
Release date
(released)source for Release date (external site)
Context window
1,048,576 tokensStated as “Input token limit 1,048,576”source for Context window (external site)
Max output tokens
65,536 tokensStated as “Output token limit 65,536”source for Max output tokens (external site)
Knowledge cutoff
Not verified
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Audio, PDFsource for Input modalities (external site)
License
Not verified
API model ID
gemini-3.1-pro-previewsource for API model ID (external site)
Status
Preview
Last verified

Reported benchmark results

5 results on file, all reported by Google DeepMind. Scores are copied exactly as published, with the settings the source stated. Rows are different measurements — compare a score only with others in the same benchmark variant, via the variant link.

Benchmark results reported for Gemini 3.1 Pro
BenchmarkVariantModel detailScoreSettings (as stated)SourceEvidence
GPQA DiamondNo variant stated — see all GPQA Diamond results for this variantThinking (High)
94.3%No CI reported
No tools; Thinking (High); all Gemini scores pass@1 unless noted (methodology PDF)
Show excerpt for Gemini 3.1 Pro (Thinking (High)) on GPQA Diamond, No variant stated
“GPQA Diamond Scientific knowledge No tools 94.3%”

Retrieved

HLENo tools — see all HLE results for this variantThinking (High)
44.4%No CI reported
No tools; full set, text + MM; column 'Gemini 3.1 Pro Thinking (High)'
Show excerpt for Gemini 3.1 Pro (Thinking (High)) on HLE, No tools
“Humanity's Last Exam Academic reasoning (full set, text + MM) No tools 44.4%”

Retrieved

HLEWith tools — see all HLE results for this variantThinking (High)
51.4%No CI reported
Search (blocklist) + Code; Thinking (High)
Show excerpt for Gemini 3.1 Pro (Thinking (High)) on HLE, With tools
“Search (blocklist) + Code 51.4%”

Retrieved

SWE-bench VerifiedNo variant stated — see all SWE-bench Verified results for this variantThinking (High)
80.6%No CI reported
Single attempt; methodology PDF says averaged over 10 runs with a bash + file-edit + submit-tool scaffold, and that the score includes a +0.6-point adjustment after Google fixed 3 official-harness items (astropy-7606, sphinx-8595, sphinx-9711) the model passed internally
Show excerpt for Gemini 3.1 Pro (Thinking (High)) on SWE-bench Verified, No variant stated
“SWE-Bench Verified Agentic coding Single attempt 80.6%”

Retrieved

Terminal-Bench2.0 — see all Terminal-Bench results for this variantThinking (High)
68.5%No CI reported
Terminus-2 harness; self-computed
Show excerpt for Gemini 3.1 Pro (Thinking (High)) on Terminal-Bench, 2.0
“Terminal-Bench 2.0 Agentic terminal coding Terminus-2 harness 68.5%”

Retrieved

Vendor-reported:
Published by the organisation that built the model. Not independently reproduced.
Report an issue with this page

Spotted a wrong number, a broken source or something out of date in “Gemini 3.1 Pro”? Tell us what and, if you can, link the correct source.

Required. At least 10 characters.

Model registry/models
Benchmarks/benchmarks
Paper breakdowns/research
AI tools directory/tools
Work with us/work-with-us