Skip to content
HARBAN AI LABS

Benchmark · Agents & tool use

τ-bench (Tool-Agent-User Interaction benchmark)

Whether a tool-using agent completes customer-service tasks (retail, airline) while following domain policy in conversation with an LLM-simulated user.
FlawedMore benchmarks in Agents & tool useDefinition checked against sources

Definition

Short name
τ-bench
Category
Agents & tool use
Introduced
2024
Metric
pass^k (pass^1 = average task success; higher k = reliability across k trials)
Direction
Higher is better
Reference check
Confirmed against the paper or official site

Health review

As of

Flawed

Documented problems — label errors, weak tests or contamination — materially affect scores.

An audit found τ-bench can count empty responses as successful; the maintainers’ README says the original tasks are outdated and points to the successor τ³-bench.

Source: arxiv.org — source for this health review (external site)

Caveats

Results on file

No results on file yet

No result for τ-bench is on file yet. We list a result only when we can trace it to a published source, and record the settings exactly as that source states them. HARBAN has not yet published internal evaluations of this benchmark.

Definitions, health labels and caveats are summarised in our own words from the linked sources. Scores are reproduced exactly as each source published them; see the methodology for how we record and group them.

Report an issue with this page

Spotted a wrong number, a broken source or something out of date in “τ-bench”? Tell us what and, if you can, link the correct source.

Required. At least 10 characters.

Model registry/models
Benchmarks/benchmarks
Paper breakdowns/research
AI tools directory/tools
Work with us/work-with-us